New York Federal Appeals Court upholds motorcycle only stops
11-5277-cv Wagner v. Sprague UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SECOND CIRCUIT SUMMARY ORDER RULINGS BY SUMMARY ORDER DO NOT HAVE PRECEDENTIAL EFFECT. CITATION TO A SUMMARY ORDER FILED ON OR AFTER JANUARY 1, 2007, IS PERMITTED AND IS GOVERNED BY FEDERAL RULE OF APPELLATE PROCEDURE 32.1 AND THIS COURT’S LOCAL RULE 32.1.1. WHEN CITING A SUMMARY ORDER IN A DOCUMENT FILED WITH THIS COURT, A PARTY MUST CITE EITHER THE FEDERAL APPENDIX OR AN ELECTRONIC DATABASE (WITH THE NOTATION “SUMMARY ORDER”). A PARTY CITING A SUMMARY ORDER MUST SERVE A COPY OF IT ON ANY PARTY NOT REPRESENTED BY COUNSEL. At a stated Term of the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit, held at the Daniel Patrick Moynihan United States Courthouse, 500 Pearl Street, in the City of New York, on the 29 th day of November, two thousand twelve, Present: AMALYA L. KEARSE, CHESTER J. STRAUB, ROSEMARY S. POOLER, Circuit Judges. _____________________________________________________ MICHAEL WAGNER, LEVI INGERSOLL, KEN FENWICK, SIDNEY ALPAUGH, Plaintiffs-Appellants, -v- 11-5277-cv WILLIAM SPRAGUE, both individually and in his capacity as a Major in the New York State Police, DAVID J. SWARTS, both individually and in his capacity as the Chair of the Governor’s Traffic Safety Committee, DANIEL LARKIN, both individually and in his capacity as a lieutenant in the New York State Police, JIM HALVORSEN, both individually and in his capacity as a lieutenant in the New York State Police, Defendants-Appellees. * _____________________________________________________ Appearing for Appellants: Tobi Rochford Salottolo (Mitchell Proner, on the brief), Proner & Proner, New York, NY Appearing for Appellees: Frank Brady, Assistant Solicitor General, (Barbara D. Underwood, Solicitor General, Nancy A. Spiegel, Senior Assistant Solicitor General, on the brief), for Eric T. Schneiderman, Attorney General of the State of New York, Albany, NY Appeal from a judgment of the United States District Court for the Northern District of New York (Sharpe, J.). ON CONSIDERATION WHEREOF, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that the judgment of said District Court be and it hereby is AFFIRMED. Plaintiffs-Appellants appeal from the district court’s grant of summary judgment, dated November 17, 2011, dismissing their claims that the motorcycle checkpoint program violated the Fourth Amendment. We assume the parties’ familiarity with the underlying facts, procedural history, and specification of issues for review. “We review a district court’s grant of summary judgment de novo, construing the evidence in the light most favorable to the nonmoving party and drawing all reasonable inferences in that party’s favor.” Kuebel v. Black & Decker, Inc., 643 F.3d 352, 358 (2d. Cir. 2011). “Summary judgment is appropriate only if the moving party shows that there are no genuine issues of material fact and that the moving party is entitled to judgment as a matter of law.” Miller v. Wolpoff & Abramson, L.L.P., 321 F.3d 292, 300 (2d Cir. 2003). While a “search or seizure is ordinarily unreasonable in the absence of individualized suspicion of wrongdoing[,] . . . certain regimes of suspicionless searches” have been upheld “where the program was designed to serve ‘special needs, beyond the normal need for law enforcement.’” City of Indianapolis v. Edmond, 531 U.S. 32, 37 (2000). The motorcycle checkpoint program in this case is exactly this sort of suspicionless search. Defendants advanced proof that the primary purpose of the program was to increase motorcycle safety. Plaintiffs have not proffered evidence sufficient to show that there is a genuine issue to be tried as to that fact. As we have previously noted, “the special needs doctrine applies to any program of searches whose ‘primary purpose’ is a government interest other than crime control, and the mere fact that crime control is one purpose—but not the primary purpose—of a program of searches does not bar the application of the special needs doctrine.” Lynch v. City of New York, 589 F.3d 94, 102 (2d Cir. 2009) (internal citation omitted). Thus, we apply the special needs balancing test outlined in Brown v. Texas, which “involves a weighing of the gravity of the public concerns served by the seizure, the degree to which the seizure advances the public interest, and the severity of the interference with individual liberty.” Brown v. Texas, 443 U.S. 47, 50-51 (1979). Applying this balancing test, we conclude that the well catalogued public interest in highway safety, see, e.g., Delaware v. Prouse, 440 U.S. 648, 658 (1979), is well served by the safety checkpoint program and outweighs the interference with individual liberty in this case. Accordingly, the district court did not err in concluding that there was no constitutional violation. We find the Appellants’ remaining arguments to be without merit. Accordingly, the judgment of the district court hereby is AFFIRMED. FOR THE COURT: Catherine O’Hagan Wolfe, Clerk.
Mandatory Motorcycle Helmet Law References
Refusal of Life-Saving Medical Treatment vs. the State’s Interest in the Preservation of Life: A Clarification of the Interests at Stake, The
robust, healthy citizens, capable of self-support, of bearing arms and of adding to the
resources of the country.”); accord, Bisenius v. Karns, 42 Wis. …
Motorcycle Helmets and the Constitutionality of Self-Protective Legislation
opinion of FG Dunn, Circuit Judge of 2d Jud. Cir., SD, dated Oct. 17, 1967; and Bisenius
v. Karns, No. 124423 (Dane County Cir. Ct., Wis., May 14, 1968). …
Constitutional Law-Due Process-Requirement That Motorcyclists Wear Protective Headgear Is beyond Legislature’s Police Power
1969); Bisenius v. Karns, 42 Wis. 2d 42, 165 NW2d 377 (1969). 59 Mich. … 2d 702, 283 NYS2d
290 (Erie Cty. Ct. 1967); Bisenius v. Karns, 42 Wis. 2d 42, 165 NW2d 377 (1969). But cf. …
Constitutional Law–Statutory Requirement of Safety Helmets for Motorcyclists
substantial federal question, 395 US 709 (1969). 16. … 54. See, State v. Odegaard, 065 NW2d 677,
678 (ND 1969); Bisenius v. Karns, 42 Wisc.2d 42, 165 NV2d 377, 380 (1969); cert. …
Illinois Seat Belt Law: Should Those Who Ride Decide, The
408, 469 P.2d 287, 290 (1970); Everhardt v. City of New Orleans, 253 La. 285, 217 So. 2d 400,
403 (1969); Bisenius v. Karns, 42 Wis. 2d 42,165 NW2d 377, 380 (1970). 14. Eg Cal. …
[CITATION] Legal memorandum on constitutionality of mandatory motorcycle helmet use statutes
Pl.bj. 2d 377, appeal dismissed, 395 US 709 (1969), the court cited numerous examples of valid
statutes aimed primarily at protecting individuals from themselves (hunters must …
Negligence-Damages-Expert Testimony on Plaintiff Motorcyclist’s Nonuse of a Helmet Is Admissible Evidence on Issue of Damages
(a real and substantial relationship exists between the exercise of police powers contained in
the helmet statute and the public health, safety, and welfare); Bisenius v. Karns, 42 Wis.2d …
Suicide: A constitutional right
alternatively be classified as a substantive due process right under the same amendment. 30.
See Bisenius v. Karns, 42 Wis. 2d. 42, 165 NW2d 377, appeal dismissed, 395 US Vol. …
Minnesota Mandatory Seat Belt Law: No Right to be Reckless, The
130, 459 P.2d 789 (1969); Bisenius v. Karns, 42 Wis. 2d 42, 165 NW2d 377 (1969); People v.
Poucher, 398 Mich. 316, 247 NW2d 798 (1976); Love v. Bell, 171 Colo. …
Mandatory Seat Belt Legislation: Panacea for Highway Traffic Fatalities
the nature of motorcycles, helmets provide unique protection and that public welfare is
substantially af- fected by the dangers inherent in motorcycle riding); Bisenius v. Karns, 42 Wis. …
Right to Decide-Individual Liberty versus State Police Powers, The
Bisenius v. Karns, 42 Wis. 2d 42, 50, 165 NW2d 377, 381 (1969) (laws protective of
other users of the highways). 27. Eg, People v. Fries, 42 Ill. …
Constitutionality of Mandatory Motorcycle Helmet Legislation
strong, robust, healthy citizens capable of self-support, of bearing arms, and of adding to the
resources of the country.”47 It is suggested in Bisenius v. Karns,iS a Wisconsin helmet law …
Police Power in Illinois: The Regulation of Private Conduct
CONDUCT The term police power is often used, but by its very nature it is in- capable
of exact definition.1 Courts and legal scholars have had …
Privacy, Autonomy, and Dignity in the Prison: A Preliminary Inquiry Concerning Constitutional Aspects of the Degradation Process in Our Prisons
INQUIRY CONCERNING CONSTITUTIONAL ASPECTS OF THE DEGRADATION
PROCESS IN OUR PRISONS RICHARD G. SINGR INTRODUCTION …
Some Thoughts About a Tort Perspective on Power: Ideas for Dean Green
Bunn v. North Carolina, 336 US 942 (1949). 13. Bisenius v. Karns, 42 Wis. 2d 42, 165 NW2d
377, appeal dismissead 395 US 709 (1969). 14. Thomas v. Housing Auth., 71 Wash. …
State ex rel. Swann v. Pack: Self-endangerment and the First Amendment
(Vt. 1969); State v. Laitinen, 459 P.2d 789 (Wash. 1969); Bisenius v. Karns, 165 NW2d 377 (Wis.
1969). и American Motorcycle Ass’n v. Davids, 158 NW2d 72 (Mich. Ct. App. …
Euthanasia Reconsidered-The Choice of Death as an Aspect of the Right of Privacy
2d 42, 52, 165 NW2d 377, 382, appeal dismissed, 395 US 709 (1969). The interest in productivity
underlies many statutory enactments, such as compulsory educa- tion laws. …
Change of the Wisconsin Comparative Negligence Statute in Multi-Defendant Suits: May v. Skelly Oil Co.
42, 165 NW2d 377 (1969); City of West Allis v. Milwaukee County, 39 Wis. 2d 356, 159 NW2d
36 (1968), cert. denied, 393 US 1064 (1969); Associated Indem. Corp. …
Private Morality and the Right to Be Free: The Thrust of Stanley v. Georgia
2d 42, 165 NW2d 377 (1969) (protection of other motorists). 35 Bates v. City of Little
Rock, 361 US 516, 524 (1960) (emphasis added). See …
Behind the Facade: Understanding the Potential Extension of the Constitutional Right to Privacy to Homosexual Conduct
v. Karns, 42 Wis. 2d 42, 165 NW2d 377, cert. denied, 395 US 709 (1969). See also Note,
Motorcycle Helmets and the Constitutionality of Self-Protective Legislation, 30 OHIO ST. …
Is There a Right to Physician-Assisted Suicide
a Wisconsin court declared that if it is deemed fatal to a statute that it seeks only to protect a person
against his own actions, many statutes would be suspect, including laws requiring …
Riding Helmetless: Personal Freedom or Societal Burden
Davidson County, 448 SW2d 408 (Tenn. 1969); State v. Acker, 485 P.2d 1038 (Utah 1971); State
v. Laitinen, 459 P.2d 789 (Wash. 1969); Bisenius v. Karns, 165 NW2d 377 (Wis. 1969). …
Hunger striking prisoners: the constitutionality of force-feeding
A.2d 176, 177-78 (Hudson County Ct. 1969) (same); Bisenius v. Karns, 42 Wis. 2d 42, 50-51,
165 NW2d 377, 381-82 (same), appeal dismissed, 395 US 709 (1969). …
The Misuse of Law as a Barrier to Injury Prevention
6 (I 9 83): 3 83-90. i i. Paris Adult Theatre I v. Slaton, 4I3 US 49 (I973). I2. Bisenius v. Karns, 4Wis.
zd4z, I65 NWZD 377 (I969),appealdismissed 395 US 709 (i969). 13. 346 F.Supp. …
Force-feeding hunger-striking prisoners: a framework for analysis
explicable purpose”); State v. Lee, 51 Hawaii 516, 518, 465 P.2d 573, 576 (1970) (state has valid
interest in preventing threat to “the very fabric of society’); Bisenius v. Karns, 42 Wis. …
Paternalism & its discontents: motorcycle helmet laws, libertarian values, and public health
Validity of Motorcycle Helmet Statutes, The
the police power; and Bisenius v. Karns, 42 Wis. 2d 42, 165 NW2d 377, appeal dismissed, 395
US 709 (1969). 52 West Coast Hotel Co. v. Parrish, 300 US 379 (1937). …
Seat Belts and Safety Helmets: Some Paternalistic Arguments
the sphere of regulation more than could be acceptably countenanced. An argument
of this kind was advanced by the court in Bisenius v. Karns: …
Knight in the Duel with Death: Physician Assisted Suicide and the Medical Necessity Defense
AND THE MEDICAL NECESSITY DEFENSE © DERRICK AUGUSTUS CARTER* I.
INTRODUCTION S UICIDE and attempted suicide are legal in America. …
Sounds of silence for the Walkman generation: rock concerts and noise-induced hearing loss
Noise-Induced Hearing Loss ERIC DANIEL JOHNSON* “Hope I die before I get
old. . .’” INTRODUCTION Every year, millions of people experience …
[PDF] Highway Safety Division of Virginia
MOTORCYCLE HELMET LEGISLATION A Review of Available Information by C.
W. Lynn Research Analyst Report Prepared by the Virginia Highway …
Disease prevention and health promotion initiatives: some legal considerations
Considerations Michael R. Pollard, JD, MPH John T. Brennan, Jr., JD, MHA National
Academy of Sciences Washington. D. C. *Dr. Pollard was a …
Is the Repeal of Mandatory Motorcycle Helmet Legislation a Contributing Factor to Traumatic Brain Injury as a Public Health Problem-Recommendations for the Future
A CONTRIBUTING FACTOR TO TRAUMATIC BRAIN INJURY AS A PUBLIC HEALTH
PROBLEM? RECOMMENDATIONS FOR THE FUTURE …
Child Safety in Automobiles: Mandatory Restraint-Use Laws
Automobile safety is an issue of long-standing concern, but only recently has special
attention been focused on the safety needs of young …
Restricting the Right to Smoke in Public Areas: Whose Rights Should be Protected
SHOULD BE PROTECTED?* H. Ward Classen** Recently, there has been a great
deal of concern as to the health hazards associated with …
Death Row Right to Die: Suicide or Intimate Decision, The
punishment, without a doubt, constitutes one of the most vola- tile legal, as well as
social and moral, issues of our time. In recent years, a controversial …
Testing the Constitutionality of Medical Malpractice Legislation: The Wisconsin Medical Malpractice Act of 1975
LEGISLATION: THE WISCONSIN MEDICAL MALPRACTICE ACT OF 1975 I.
INTRODUCTION The growing concern with the problems of medical malpractice1 …
Suicidal rights
reasons. First, because everything naturally loves itself. . . . Wherefore suicide is con- trary to
the inclination of nature, and to charity whereby every man should love himself. …
Supplying organs for transplantation
The transplantation of organs will be assimilated into ordinary clinical practice . . .
and there is no need to be philosophical about it. This will come …
[BOOK] Roster of the Rainbow division (forty-second) Major General Wm. A. Mann commanding
North Carolina. KARNES, PERCY R., Pvt. 1st class, 367 9th Ave., Southwest, Roanoke,
Virginia. KEMP, OSWALD S., Pvt., Gloucester, Virginia. …
Reallocating the Risk of Loss in Automobile Accidents by Means of Mandatory Seat Belt Use Legislation
Seat Belt Use Legislation TABLE OF CONTENTS I. THE FOUR ALTERNATIVES ….. 95 A. THE
MAJORITY RULE: EVIDENCE OF NONUSE NOT ADMISSIBLE ….. 97 …